aryem.dev

Building Real-Time AI Voice Agents: A Deep Dive into LiveKit and Pipecat

4 min read

Building Real-Time AI Voice Agents: A Deep Dive into LiveKit and Pipecat

As a founding engineer of the EG-Labs initiative at Easygenerator, I’ve spent considerable time exploring the frontier of conversational AI. One of the most exciting projects was architecting real-time AI voice agents using LiveKit, Pipecat, and OpenAI. Here’s what I learned building this from the ground up.

The Challenge

Traditional chatbots are limiting. Users type, wait, read responses, and repeat. But human conversation is fluid, dynamic, and real-time. We wanted to create voice agents that could:

  • Respond with minimal latency (under 1 second)
  • Handle natural speech patterns with interruptions
  • Maintain conversation context across turns
  • Work across web, mobile, and embedded platforms

The Technology Stack

LiveKit: The WebRTC Foundation

LiveKit provides the real-time communication infrastructure. It handles:

  • Ultra-low latency audio streaming using WebRTC
  • Automatic codec negotiation and quality adaptation
  • Cross-platform support (web, iOS, Android, desktop)
  • Scalable cloud infrastructure

Why LiveKit over alternatives? It’s purpose-built for real-time AI applications with native support for agent workflows.

Pipecat: The AI Agent Framework

Pipecat sits between LiveKit and AI services, orchestrating the complex dance of:

  • Speech-to-text transcription
  • LLM processing for understanding and response generation
  • Text-to-speech synthesis
  • Conversation state management

The framework handles the hardest parts: pipeline coordination, buffering strategies, and interruption handling.

OpenAI: The Intelligence Layer

We integrated OpenAI’s models for:

  • Whisper for speech recognition
  • GPT-4 for conversation understanding and generation
  • Text-to-speech for natural voice output

Architecture Overview

User's Microphone
    ↓
[LiveKit Client] ←→ WebRTC ←→ [LiveKit Server]
                                    ↓
                              [Pipecat Agent]
                                    ↓
                    ┌───────────────┼───────────────┐
                    ↓               ↓               ↓
              [Whisper STT]   [GPT-4 Chat]   [TTS Engine]
                    ↓               ↓               ↓
                    └───────────────┴───────────────┘
                                    ↓
                            [Audio Response]
                                    ↓
                              User's Speakers

Key Implementation Insights

1. Latency Is Everything

In voice conversations, every millisecond matters. We optimized for:

  • Streaming responses: Don’t wait for complete LLM output, stream tokens as they arrive
  • Concurrent processing: Start TTS synthesis before LLM completes
  • Smart buffering: Balance quality vs. responsiveness in audio chunking

Result: Average response time of 800ms from user finishing speech to agent starting reply.

2. Handling Interruptions Gracefully

Humans interrupt constantly. The agent needs to:

  • Detect when the user starts speaking during agent response
  • Immediately stop audio playback
  • Cancel in-flight TTS requests
  • Retain partial context for continuity

Pipecat’s state machine makes this manageable, but tuning sensitivity is critical.

3. Context Management

Voice conversations meander. We implemented:

  • Conversation memory: Last N turns for short-term context
  • Semantic compression: Summarize older context to fit token limits
  • Intent tracking: Maintain user goals across topic shifts

4. Voice Quality Matters

Natural-sounding voices dramatically improve user experience. We tested:

  • OpenAI’s native TTS (good balance of quality and latency)
  • ElevenLabs (superior quality, higher latency)
  • Cartesia (optimized for real-time, good compromise)

The choice depends on your latency requirements and voice quality bar.

Production Challenges

Scaling WebRTC Connections

Each concurrent conversation requires:

  • Active WebRTC connection (network overhead)
  • Running agent instance (compute cost)
  • Real-time LLM and TTS calls (API costs)

We architected for:

  • Dynamic agent scaling with Kubernetes
  • Connection pooling and reuse
  • Graceful degradation under load

Cost Management

Real-time AI is expensive:

  • Whisper API: ~$0.006/minute
  • GPT-4 tokens: Variable, conversation-dependent
  • TTS: ~$15/million characters

Optimization strategies:

  • Voice Activity Detection (VAD) to minimize STT calls
  • Smart caching for common responses
  • Cheaper models for simple intents

Error Handling

Real-time systems fail in interesting ways:

  • Network hiccups during streaming
  • API rate limits mid-conversation
  • Audio codec incompatibilities

Build robust fallbacks:

  • Graceful retry logic
  • User feedback during delays
  • Automatic reconnection handling

Results and Learnings

Building real-time AI voice agents taught me:

  1. User expectations are different: People are remarkably forgiving of AI limitations in voice, but intolerant of delays
  2. The uncanny valley is real: 90% human-like is worse than 70% - commit to clearly AI or nearly perfect
  3. Context switching is costly: Pipeline coordination complexity grows non-linearly

What’s Next?

The field is evolving rapidly:

  • Multi-modal agents (voice + vision)
  • Emotional intelligence and tone matching
  • Agent-to-agent communication
  • On-device processing for privacy

Resources

If you’re building voice agents:

Conclusion

Real-time AI voice agents are no longer science fiction. With the right stack (LiveKit + Pipecat + modern LLMs), you can build production-ready conversational experiences.

The technology is mature enough for real applications, but young enough that there’s tremendous room for innovation. If you’re considering voice AI for your product, now is an exciting time to dive in.

Have you built voice agents? I’d love to hear about your architecture choices and challenges. Find me on LinkedIn.

Graph View